The waiting room at the Marion County Department of Public Health and Social Services smells like burnt coffee and old carpet. It was a Tuesday morning in late February when a social worker named Gloria Reyes — no relation — pulled me aside and said, “There’s a woman here you really should talk to.” She pointed toward a corner chair where a compact woman in a FedEx uniform jacket sat with a yellow legal pad, filling out rows of numbers in neat columns. That was Darlene Matsuda.
I introduced myself, explained what I cover, and asked if she’d be willing to share her story. She looked at her notepad, then at me, and said, “Only if it helps somebody else not make the same mistakes I did.” We talked for nearly two hours that day, and again by phone three more times over the following weeks.
A Return That Should Have Been Simple
Darlene Matsuda is 66 years old and has driven delivery routes for FedEx Ground out of the Indianapolis hub for eleven years. She earns a base salary in the upper-middle range — she preferred I not publish the exact figure — and files her taxes every year with the same online software she’s used since 2018. For the 2025 tax year, she submitted her federal return on January 28, 2026, nearly two months before the April 15 deadline.
Her expected refund was $3,412. She had withheld conservatively throughout the year, the way she always does, and she was counting on that money for two specific things: catching up on $2,850 in delinquent Marion County property taxes and covering the spring semester deposit for her younger brother Marcus, who attends Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis on a partial scholarship.
“I checked the tracker every single morning,” Darlene told me. “February 18 came and went. Then it just said ‘being processed.’ No date. Nothing.” She wasn’t panicking yet — she’d heard of delays before — but she started keeping a log of every time she checked the tool and what it said. That legal pad she was filling out when I met her was page four of that log.
The Workers’ Comp Complication Nobody Warned Her About
In September 2025, Darlene slipped on a wet loading dock ramp and injured her left shoulder. She filed a workers’ compensation claim with FedEx’s third-party insurer. The claim was denied in November 2025, a decision she was actively appealing. In the meantime, she had received a $1,100 partial payment from the insurer before the denial — money she reported on her return as “other income” using the guidance she found on IRS.gov.
What Darlene didn’t realize was that the insurer had also issued a 1099-MISC for that $1,100 payment — and the amount on their form didn’t match the line she’d reported it on. The insurer coded it under Box 3 (Other Income). Darlene’s software had placed it elsewhere based on her description. It was a $0 difference in total taxable income, but a form-matching mismatch that, according to IRS automated screening procedures, can flag a return for manual review.
As Darlene explained it to me, she had no idea a coding discrepancy — not an error in the dollar amount, just a box number — could reroute her entire return out of the standard electronic processing queue. “I reported every cent,” she said. “I did everything right. And somehow doing it right still wasn’t right enough.”
Six Weeks In: The Letter That Explained Nothing
On March 11, 2026 — forty-two days after filing — Darlene received a CP05 notice from the IRS. According to the IRS’s CP05 explanation page, this notice means the agency is reviewing the return to verify income, tax withholding, credits, and any business income reported. It is not an audit. It does not mean something is wrong. And it offers no revised timeline.
Darlene called anyway. She waited on hold for one hour and forty minutes before reaching an IRS representative. The rep confirmed the return was under review but could not give her a timeline or explain the specific reason. “She was very polite,” Darlene told me. “But she basically read me the letter I already had. I was no further along after two hours than I was before.”
With no refund in sight and a property tax penalty clock ticking, Darlene made the call she hated making: she asked her brother Marcus to defer his spring enrollment deposit by two weeks. He did it without complaint, she said, but the guilt sat heavily on her.
What Finally Moved the Refund Forward
By the end of March, Darlene had done two things that appear to have helped — though neither comes with any guarantee. First, on March 22, she submitted a written response to the IRS through her online account, attaching the 1099-MISC she had received from the insurer and a brief explanatory note clarifying the workers’ comp payment. Second, she contacted the Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS), a program within the IRS that assists taxpayers facing significant hardship as a result of refund delays.
According to the Taxpayer Advocate Service, qualifying hardships include situations where a taxpayer faces an immediate threat of adverse action — such as a property tax lien. Darlene received a TAS case number on March 27.
On April 5, 2026 — seventy-seven days after she filed — the $3,412 landed in Darlene’s checking account. She saw it at 6:14 a.m. before her shift started, she told me, while sitting in the FedEx lot eating a granola bar. “I just sat there for a minute,” she said. “Not happy exactly. Just… relieved. And really tired.”
The Cost of Waiting — and What She’d Do Differently
The refund arrived, but not without consequence. Marion County had assessed a $214 late penalty on the delinquent property taxes by the time she paid them on April 6. Marcus’s enrollment deposit had been covered by a short-term loan from a friend, which Darlene repaid immediately. The injury appeal is still ongoing.
When I asked Darlene what she wished she’d known before filing, she was precise in a way that reminded me why the social worker had pointed me to her in the first place.
She also told me she wasn’t aware of the Taxpayer Advocate Service until someone in the county assistance office waiting room — another person in a delay situation — mentioned it in passing. “That’s not something the IRS advertises loudly,” she said. “It should be on every CP05 letter in plain language.”
The comparison below shows the options Darlene had at different stages of her wait, and what each path typically involves:
Darlene is pragmatic about the whole experience. She doesn’t carry bitterness toward the IRS as an institution — she describes herself as someone who believes in paying taxes and paying them correctly. What bothers her is the silence. “It’s not the wait,” she told me during our last phone call. “It’s not knowing if you did something wrong, if something’s coming, if you need to hire somebody. The not-knowing is what wears you down.”
I left that first conversation in the county waiting room thinking about the legal pad she’d been filling out when I arrived. Four pages of dates and tracker statuses, logged every morning before a shift that starts at 5:45 a.m. Darlene Matsuda is 66, still driving delivery routes, still paying property taxes, still making sure her brother stays in school. The IRS eventually did what it was supposed to do. It just took seventy-seven days to get there.
Related: A Baltimore Firefighter Lost $18,000 in Overtime and Nearly Lost His House — Here’s What Actually Helped
Related: A UPS Driver’s Side Hustle Was Growing Until Tax Season Revealed the Real Cost
Leave a Reply