IRS

She Claimed Her Disabled Brother as a Dependent. The IRS Sent Her a CP05 Notice Instead of a Refund

The letter arrived on a Tuesday in late January — a single sheet of IRS paper that, according to Monique Washington, felt heavier than anything…

She Claimed Her Disabled Brother as a Dependent. The IRS Sent Her a CP05 Notice Instead of a Refund
She Claimed Her Disabled Brother as a Dependent. The IRS Sent Her a CP05 Notice Instead of a Refund

The letter arrived on a Tuesday in late January — a single sheet of IRS paper that, according to Monique Washington, felt heavier than anything she’d carried off a UPS truck in seventeen years. It wasn’t a check. It was a CP05 notice: her 2025 federal tax refund had been selected for review, and the agency needed up to 60 days to verify her income, withholding, and the dependent she had claimed. Her brother, Darnell, 37, had been that dependent for the better part of a decade on paper — and for much longer than that in real life.

When I sat down with Monique Washington at a diner near her home in West Baltimore on a cold Wednesday morning in March 2026, she had her CP05 letter with her in a manila folder alongside a printed copy of her Where’s My Refund transcript. She smoothed both documents flat on the table with the methodical calm of someone who has learned to manage chaos by organizing paper.

KEY TAKEAWAY
The IRS can hold a refund for up to 60 days after issuing a CP05 notice without providing a specific reason. Taxpayers who claim disabled relatives as qualifying dependents are among those most frequently selected for income verification reviews, according to IRS.gov.

How Monique Got to This Point — and What She Was Owed

Monique has driven a UPS route in Baltimore since 2009. She earns a union wage that, after overtime, put her 2025 gross income at approximately $84,600. On paper, that sounds comfortable. In practice, she told me, the math tells a different story.

Darnell was 25 when a driver ran a red light and struck the passenger side of his car. The accident left him with a traumatic brain injury that requires daily support for medication management, transportation, and the cognitive tasks most adults handle on their own. Their parents died within three years of each other — their mother in 2017, their father in 2019 — leaving Monique as the only family member available and willing to step in.

$1,310
Monique’s avg. monthly out-of-pocket for Darnell’s care

$3,840
Federal refund expected on her 2025 return

67
Days she waited before the refund was released

Darnell receives Social Security Disability Insurance — roughly $1,180 per month in 2025 — but that amount doesn’t stretch to cover his accessible transportation needs, the supplemental aides his Medicaid waiver excludes, or the adaptive equipment that wears out faster than any insurance reimbursement schedule acknowledges. Monique fills the gap. She estimates she spent approximately $15,720 out of pocket on his care in 2025 alone.

“I don’t think about it as a budget,” she told me, stirring her coffee without drinking it. “I think about it as: what does he need this week, and do I have it. I stopped doing long-term financial planning somewhere around 2021.”

What She Claimed and Why the IRS Flagged It

Monique filed her 2025 federal return on February 3, 2026, using a paid tax preparer she has worked with for four years. She claimed Darnell as a qualifying relative dependent under IRS rules — a designation available to taxpayers who provide more than half of a person’s total support for the year and whose gross income falls below a specific threshold. For tax year 2025, that gross income limit for qualifying relatives was $5,050, according to IRS Publication 501.

Darnell’s SSDI income doesn’t count toward that threshold for dependency purposes under current IRS rules — a distinction that Monique’s preparer had documented carefully. She also claimed a portion of his unreimbursed medical expenses as itemized deductions. Her expected refund of $3,840 reflected federal withholding overpayments throughout the year.

⚠ IMPORTANT
A CP05 notice does not mean you did anything wrong. The IRS uses these reviews to verify income and withholding amounts against employer records. Taxpayers are instructed not to contact the IRS until the 60-day review period has passed — a timeline that can extend further if additional documentation is requested.

The CP05 arrived on January 28, 2026 — just 25 days after she filed. The IRS’s Where’s My Refund tool, which Monique checked daily, shifted from “Return Received” to “We have received your tax return and it is being reviewed” and stayed there. No additional correspondence arrived. No phone call. Just the holding pattern.

“I knew I hadn’t done anything wrong. My preparer was confident. But when you’re waiting on almost four thousand dollars and you’ve got supply orders backing up, ‘we’re reviewing it’ doesn’t really mean anything.”
— Monique Washington, UPS driver, Baltimore, MD

The Sixty-Day Waiting Room Nobody Prepared Her For

What Monique described next was less a financial crisis and more a slow-burn exhaustion — the kind that accumulates when every contingency plan depends on a single incoming payment. She had delayed ordering Darnell’s compression garments, which cost approximately $340 per set and aren’t covered by his Medicaid plan. She had pushed back a repair on the accessible van she uses to transport him to his weekly therapy appointment. She had not, she said flatly, taken a day off since December.

That last point landed harder than the dollar figures. Monique told me she hasn’t taken a real vacation — meaning more than two consecutive days away from Baltimore — in six years. She can’t change her shift at UPS because her current schedule aligns with Darnell’s aide’s hours. She can’t relocate. She can’t, as she put it, “make any of the moves that would make my own life easier.”

Timeline: Monique’s Refund Journey
1
February 3, 2026 — Filed 2025 federal return electronically; expected refund of $3,840, including dependent claim for Darnell.

2
January 28, 2026 — CP05 notice received. IRS initiated income and withholding verification. 60-day review clock started.

3
Weeks 3–7 — Where’s My Refund showed no updates. Monique delayed two medical supply orders and deferred a van repair.

4
April 10, 2026 (projected) — Refund of $3,840 released to direct deposit on day 67. No additional documentation was ever requested.

She called the IRS Taxpayer Advocate Service line twice during the waiting period. The first call resulted in a hold time of over two hours before she disconnected. The second call, placed on a Friday morning before her route, connected her to a representative who confirmed the return was under review but could not provide a more specific timeline. “She was very polite,” Monique said. “But polite doesn’t pay for medical tape.”

What the Refund Actually Covered — and What It Couldn’t

The $3,840 arrived as a direct deposit on April 10, 2026 — 67 days after she filed. Monique told me she had the deposit alert set on her phone and checked it before her 6 a.m. shift. She didn’t celebrate, exactly. She opened a spreadsheet.

“The first thing I did was pay back the money I borrowed from myself — from the account I was supposed to be using for the van insurance renewal. The second thing I did was order Darnell’s supplies. That was the whole plan. There wasn’t anything left after that.”
— Monique Washington

When I asked what she would have done with the money if she hadn’t needed to cover the backlog, she was quiet for a moment. “Retirement, maybe. I haven’t put anything into my 401(k) in three years. My union has a good plan. I just — there’s always something more urgent.” She said it without bitterness, which somehow made it worse to hear.

Her tax preparer has already flagged several items for the 2026 return: potential adjustments to her withholding to avoid a large refund next year, and a review of whether additional unreimbursed expenses qualify under current IRS guidelines. Monique said she appreciated the advice. She also said she wasn’t sure she had the bandwidth to engage with it before summer.

Expense Category Annual Cost Covered by Medicaid/SSDI
Accessible transportation ~$4,800 Partial
Medical supplies (not covered) ~$4,080 No
Supplemental aide hours ~$6,240 Partial
Adaptive equipment repairs ~$600 No
Total out-of-pocket (est.) ~$15,720

The Larger Picture Behind One Delayed Refund

Monique’s situation sits at the intersection of several policy gaps that affect millions of family caregivers across the country. There is no federal refundable tax credit specifically designed for adult family caregivers — a gap that advocacy organizations have pushed Congress to address for years. The existing Credit for Other Dependents, which Monique’s preparer confirmed she qualified for, provides a non-refundable credit of up to $500 per qualifying dependent, according to IRS guidelines. That amount, Monique noted, covers roughly two weeks of Darnell’s supplemental aide hours.

The CP05 review process itself adds a layer of administrative friction that falls disproportionately on filers with complex dependency situations. The IRS Taxpayer Advocate Service has repeatedly cited refund delays as a significant burden for low- and moderate-income filers who depend on annual refunds to cover essential expenses — a category that, based on what Monique described, clearly includes her.

“I did everything right. I filed early. I had documentation. I’ve claimed him for years. And it still took 67 days and two phone calls I didn’t have time to make. I’m not looking for sympathy. I just want people to understand that ‘the system works’ doesn’t feel true when you’re the one waiting.”
— Monique Washington, Baltimore, MD

When I left the diner, Monique had a 7 a.m. route starting in less than an hour. She tucked her manila folder back into her tote bag alongside a printed copy of Darnell’s next therapy schedule. She didn’t seem angry, exactly. She seemed like someone who had long ago made a private decision to keep moving and only occasionally allowed herself to notice the weight of it.

The refund came. It covered what it needed to cover. Her retirement account remains at the same balance it held three years ago. She has not yet rescheduled a vacation.

Related: The IRS Letter That Almost Cost Me My Full 2025 Tax Refund — And What You Can Do Right Now

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a CP05 notice from the IRS?

A CP05 notice means the IRS has selected your return for income and withholding verification. The agency can take up to 60 days to complete the review, and taxpayers are instructed not to call until that period has passed, according to IRS.gov.
Can you claim a disabled sibling as a dependent on your taxes?

Yes. Under IRS qualifying relative rules, you can claim a sibling as a dependent if you provide more than half of their support and their gross income is below $5,050 for tax year 2025. Social Security Disability Insurance income generally does not count toward that threshold for dependency purposes, per IRS Publication 501.
How long can the IRS hold a refund after a CP05 notice?

The IRS states it needs up to 60 days to complete the review triggered by a CP05 notice. If additional information is required, the hold can extend further. In Monique Washington’s case, the refund was released on day 67 with no additional documentation ever requested.
What is the Credit for Other Dependents in 2025?

The Credit for Other Dependents is a non-refundable credit of up to $500 per qualifying dependent who does not meet the Child Tax Credit requirements. It covers qualifying relatives such as adult disabled siblings, according to IRS guidelines.
What can I do if my refund is delayed past 60 days after a CP05 notice?

After the 60-day review window passes without resolution, taxpayers can contact the IRS Taxpayer Advocate Service for assistance. The TAS has authority to intervene in cases where delays are causing documented financial hardship, as noted in its annual reports to Congress.

29 articles

Dr. Eliot Soren Vance

Senior Health & Pharma Writer covering FDA policy, drug safety, and public health. Pharm.D. UCSF. M.P.H. Johns Hopkins. Former FDA advisory committee member.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *